I prompted Claude.ai to analyze 107 blog posts on the topic of CONSCIOUSNESS
“The arc isn’t what you might think it is. The surface narrative is: Steve gets interested in consciousness around 2008–2010, reads voraciously through the early 2010s, and gradually moves toward nonduality and the illusory self. That’s true but it misses something more interesting.”
In William Gibson’s novel, The Peripheral, humanoid robots called peripherals were used to transmit one’s consciousness to a different place (or time). … In many eastern spiritual traditions, we are not the body/mind, rather the awareness (which is universal) manifesting in the human organism. I asked GPT-5 to comment on Gibson’s metaphor: Continue reading
Time is an illusion. A concept. There is only “now.” Memories happen in the now… the future can only be imagined in the now. A common view in Eastern spiritual traditions, philosophy, and science. Anxious and worried thoughts are usually about a future that exists only in the mind. So here’s my question…
What about hope? The hope we experience in the now is inherently future-based. If we’re hoping for a different/better future, are we missing the now? I put the question to ChatGPT: Continue reading
When I’m reading a book I sometimes stop at the end of a chapter but just as often stop reading in the middle of a page or a paragraph. When I pick the book up again, an hour or even a day later, I open the book to the bookmarked page and start reading to find where I had stopped reading. Before I am conscious of reading a line, my eye is instantly(?) pulled to the exact line where I previously stopped. Every time. It’s as though my brain has scanned the page and remembered where I quite reading, before I am consciously aware of this happening. I asked GPT 4o to explain this phenomenon:
Why Your Eyes Instantly Find Where You Left Off in a Book
When you return to a book and your eyes are drawn immediately to the exact spot where you stopped reading—even in the middle of a paragraph—it’s the result of several subtle mental processes working together:
1. Implicit Memory at Work
Your brain doesn’t necessarily store a conscious note like “I stopped in paragraph three.” Instead, it saves a situational snapshot—a blend of the visual pattern of the text, the shape of the paragraphs, the words nearby, and your position on the page. This is a form of implicit memory—unconscious knowledge that influences your behavior without deliberate recall.
2. Visual-Spatial Recognition
Books are both visual and spatial. Your brain remembers where you were on the page (top, middle, lower left, etc.). When you reopen the book, your eyes are drawn to that same general area because the layout is unchanged—your mental map still fits.
3. Contextual Cueing
This is a subconscious process where your brain uses surrounding information to guide your attention. Words or phrases near your stopping point act as subtle cues. Even if you don’t consciously recall them, they feel familiar and help your eyes lock in on the right spot.
4. Speed: Faster Than Conscious Thought
You often find the right place before you’re even aware of reading. Your brain’s attentional systems guide your eyes within milliseconds—faster than conscious awareness can keep up. It’s as if your mind says, “Don’t worry, I’ve got this.”
5. Meditation May Enhance This
If you practice meditation (as you do), your ability to notice subtle shifts in attention and visual memory may be heightened. You’re more likely to register that precise moment of recognition and experience it with clarity.
In short, your brain combines visual memory, spatial awareness, and unconscious pattern recognition to bring your eyes exactly where they need to go—with remarkable precision and speed.
I remain fascinated that GPT remembers things like my practice of meditation. I followed up on that. And in how many other parts of our daily life is this happening.
After years of reading and meditation practice, I’m convinced that 1) the self and free will are illusions. Most of our existence is happening under the hood. Our experiences are just replays.
This is one of the better explanations of the illusory nature of the self. The closer I get to understanding this, the more impossible it becomes for me to share it. This video might be as close as I’ll get. Watch on YouTube
Anyone who knows me knows of my interest in consciousness and reality (see tags below for more). When it comes to understanding reality, I’m gonna go with one of the following. (or some combination.)
Monism is the view that all reality is fundamentally one substance or principle. Everything in the universe is ultimately the same kind of thing. This can be physical (everything is matter) or mental (everything is mind), or something else entirely.
Panpsychism, on the other hand, is the idea that consciousness is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of the universe. According to panpsychism, all things have some form of consciousness or experience, even if it’s very basic, down to the smallest particles.
So, while both can be viewed as “unifying” theories, monism is about the nature of reality being one substance, whereas panpsychism is about consciousness being fundamental and present everywhere.
I’ve long been interested in how the mind works. What is consciousness? How is that different from awareness? Where do thoughts come from? Is the sense of self an illusion?
From the video below: “At its core, AI, just like the human mind, is all about processing information. It uses complex algorithms, labels, and symbols to make sense of the world and respond to its environment. It takes raw data as input, processes it based on its programming, and generates an output.”
Here’s another excerpt from the video (watch on YouTube) I found really interesting:
“The choice to use an AI voice has sparked a lot of conversations. Some people feel that using it makes the message feel less personal, less human. But others find it refreshing, even profound. Its neutrality and essentially egoless nature allows the message itself to shine through more clearly.”
I started having voice conversations with ChatGPT in late 2023 and prefer that to text since more of my questions turn into conversations. Put me in the “refreshing/profound” column. If you are into (as we said in the 60’s) this kind of stuff, I think you’l really enjoy this video.
Two of my favorite authors (David Eagleman and Kevin Kelly) discussing two of my favorite topics (AI and the mind). Mr. Kelly was thinking/writing about this way back in 2017.
Given how poor I was at math and science, my interest in quantum theory is surprising. A dozen or so blog posts and some reading. This video explores intersection of quantum physics, consciousness and Eastern philosophy (Zen and Buddhism), as put forth by Erwin Schrodinger. If you’re looking for an explanation of how The Whole Shebang works, this is it for me.
I don’t remember when or how I became interested in consciousness. My reading has included some titles by neuroscientists (like David Eagleman) but I tend to lean toward the philosophical or contemplative (metaphysical?). Most of which has been excerpted here (110 posts!) For my money, David Eagleman explains (discusses) this slippery subject better than anyone.
I struggled with how to describe my interest in the non-scientific approaches to consciousness so I asked ChatGPT:
A good term that bridges the gap between the scientific and the mystical without leaning too far in either direction might be “philosophical” or “phenomenological.”
If you’re looking for something even broader, “metaphysical” works, though it might feel too abstract.