The explosion of tattoo culture

Steve: I rarely see anyone under the age of 30 without a tattoo. Could be any number of reasons for this: location; my age; etc. Wasn’t that long ago that you didn’t see that many people with tattoos. Bikers, Navy vets, the occasional free spirit. But sometime in the last 15 years (?) I started seeing them everywhere. I’m wondering if there has been some reputable academic research on the cultural causes/significance of this trend.

ChatGPT: The explosion of tattoo culture in the past 15–20 years is a striking cultural shift. It went from fringe to mainstream with remarkable speed. What was once associated with bikers, sailors, punks, and rebels has become almost a rite of passage for a lot of younger people, and yes, there’s been a fair amount of serious academic and sociological attention paid to the phenomenon. Here’s a summary (PDF) of what that research tends to say, along with a few respected sources.

BookBuddy Pro

Editors Note: Following description by ChatGPT. Screencast below is a brief look at my BookBuddy collection.


BookBuddy Pro is a mobile app for cataloging personal book collections, designed primarily for iPhone and iPad users. Developed by Kimico Ltd., it offers a clean, intuitive interface and a powerful feature set tailored to readers who want to organize their libraries without the noise of social features or community input. Continue reading

Apple Music “All Time”

When I fired up the Apple Music app this morning I was greeted with a new playlist. “In honor of Apple Music’s first decade, take a look back. Relive your all-time favorite tracks, all in one playlist.” 100 songs that will take 7 hours and 10 minutes to listen to. And a great playlist it is. (If you’re an Apple Music subscriber that link will take you there)

Apple Music launched on June 30, 2015 and I did my first blog post on July 2. I was immediately taken with Apple Music and have happily paid $109 a year for the service. While I did not have a massive collection of albums and CD’s, I gave them away shortly after subscribing to Apple Music and have never regretted the decision. In the ensuing ten years Apple Music has “learned” my musical preferences and created better playlists than I could have.

How to Surf the Web in 2025

Editor’s Note: I’m sharing so much of this post because it’s all good and I don’t have the skill to adequately summarize. I encourage you to “surf” to the full post.


“Just as it’s still possible (though seldom necessary) to ride a horse, it is still possible to surf the internet. It’s a thrill not yet lost to time.

By “surfing the internet” I don’t just mean going online. I mean exploring the internet solely by following hyperlinks from page to page, with no clear destination except for that one wonderful, as-yet-unknown website that will amaze and enthrall you when you find it, the one that will seem like it’s been waiting for you your whole life and which you can’t get enough of.

To surf, you must begin on a normal website with outbound links, and avoid all the algorithm-driven thoroughfares (Reddit, YouTube, X, any “apps”) that direct most of today’s internet traffic. You also have to be on a real computer, not a phone. If you end up on social media, you’re no longer surfing.

Younger readers may not even know that the internet used to be made entirely of websites, created by human beings, connected only by hyperlinks. Hyperlinks served as signposts, hand-placed by other humans, to point fellow travelers to unique locations they would not otherwise have known about. There were no corporate-owned thoroughfares, just many pathways shooting off from each clearing, marked by these handmade signs, beckoning you onward to some other place in the wilderness.

This internet, of the late 90s to early 2000s, offered a completely different sensory and emotional experience than today’s. To switch metaphors slightly, the old web felt like an endless city of conjoined, wildly decorated apartments, to be traversed by climbing through little chutes and portals in their walls. Each one sent you straight to some other eccentric space, built by some other eccentric character, each with its own array of chutes radiating out from there.

Surfing through this structure was characterized feelings of wonder and abundance. Just beyond that next portal was possibly something you’ve never seen. You were zipping around the universe, discovering things you didn’t know were even a thing, and the universe was expanding.

This era ended when we weren’t looking. In 2018, I came across an article that gave me a lump in my throat. It was titled I Don’t Know How to Waste Time on the Internet Anymore by Dan Nosowitz. He described a moment in which he was bored at work, tried to surf the internet, and realized he didn’t know how to do that anymore.

I realized then that I didn’t either, and hadn’t for a long time. Our online behavior, by that point, had been captured by big platforms that initially served as portals into that endless ramshackle apartment complex, but had at some point became the entire visible landscape. To “go online”, instead of typing in your favorite websites (fark.com, Digg, LiveJournal) and leapfrogging from there, people started going to their “home” on Facebook or Reddit and ended up wherever they were pointed to, which was usually another place inside Facebook or Reddit. The ethos had become capture-and-retain, rather than swing-by-and-say-hi. Open-water internet navigation – surfing – quietly went away, as these platforms designed slicker and more magnetic engagement routines for us.

While it will never be a habit again for most people, you can still surf the internet. You can pick a website with a lot of outbound links (they do still exist) and follow your heart.”

MovieLens.org

Editor’s Note: In the two years I’ve been playing with AI I’ve shared what I thought were some of the more interesting “conversations”, always being careful to distinguish something I wrote from AI output. ChatGPT frequently offers to compose a blog post and the drafts are as well written (better?) than mine. But they’re not mine. ChatGPT wrote (or plagiarized ) the following.


MovieLens is a free, non-commercial movie recommendation website developed by the GroupLens research lab at the University of Minnesota. It’s designed to help users discover movies they’re likely to enjoy based on their individual tastes. The site uses collaborative filtering algorithms to generate personalized recommendations, improving as more ratings are added.

Getting started is simple: users rate movies they’ve already seen using a five-star scale. The more films you rate, the better the system becomes at understanding your preferences. MovieLens then offers tailored suggestions that can be filtered by genre, release decade, popularity, and more.

One of the key strengths of MovieLens is its clean, ad-free interface and its emphasis on transparency. It doesn’t promote content for profit, and it doesn’t track users for advertising purposes. The recommendations are driven purely by user data and academic research.

Users can view their own rating history, create custom movie lists, and explore trends or themes in their viewing habits. While it lacks the social features of some commercial services, its core focus is accuracy and simplicity in recommendation.

MovieLens is especially useful for cinephiles who want to keep a record of what they’ve seen and find new films aligned with their personal taste, without the influence of box office hype or crowd-sourced noise. It’s also a valuable tool for researchers and students studying recommendation systems, as its algorithm and structure have been used in numerous academic projects and publications.

“The Computer-Science Bubble Is Bursting”

The subhead from this article in The Atlantic says it all: Artificial intelligence is ideally suited to replacing the very type of person who built it.

From 2005 to 2023, the number of comp-sci majors in the United States quadrupled. All of which makes the latest batch of numbers so startling. This year, enrollment grew by only 0.2 percent nationally. […] Artificial intelligence has proved to be even more valuable as a writer of computer code than as a writer of words. This means it is ideally suited to replacing the very type of person who built it. A recent Pew study found that Americans think software engineers will be most affected by generative AI.

I used to joke that (in 1966) I majored in Stay Out of Vietnam. Even back then, I couldn’t imagine what I would do with a major in Speech/Theater. But according to the Atlantic article, economists are suggesting college students “Major in a subject that offers enduring, transferable skills.”

I think of that sometimes when I’m writing a big check to the appliance repairman, the heating and AC service guy, or the plumber and electrician.

Discussing a book with something that hasn’t read it

I couldn’t find authoritative data but  I assume millions of copies of William Gibson’s novel, The Peripheral have been sold. And many more millions share my interest in Eastern spiritual traditions (specifically the illusory nature of the self). And the subset of those who fall into both groups is probably large… I just don’t happen to know any of those people. So I fired up my ChatGPT app fully aware of the bullshit risk.

“I’d like to get your take on one of the plot elements in William Gibson’s novel, The Peripheral. Before I get to that, I’m curious about how you know what you know. For example, were you trained on the full text of that novel or would your “understanding” be based on reviews or other sources?”

The rest of the conversation (PDF) was pretty interesting.